<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to save money by spending more of it</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.paystolivegreen.com/2009/07/how-to-save-money-by-spending-more-of-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.paystolivegreen.com/2009/07/how-to-save-money-by-spending-more-of-it/</link>
	<description>Save Money By Going Green.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 17:47:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Don&#8217;t lose your head on Black Friday</title>
		<link>http://www.paystolivegreen.com/2009/07/how-to-save-money-by-spending-more-of-it/#comment-34133</link>
		<dc:creator>Don&#8217;t lose your head on Black Friday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 12:56:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paystolivegreen.com/?p=1123#comment-34133</guid>
		<description>[...] right one? Will it last? Or will you have to buy a new one again when it breaks in a few months? Buying quality will save you money in the long run. And not having to get rid of broken stuff all the time will save the environment from tons [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] right one? Will it last? Or will you have to buy a new one again when it breaks in a few months? Buying quality will save you money in the long run. And not having to get rid of broken stuff all the time will save the environment from tons [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why it doesn&#8217;t matter whether climate change is manmade or not</title>
		<link>http://www.paystolivegreen.com/2009/07/how-to-save-money-by-spending-more-of-it/#comment-24682</link>
		<dc:creator>Why it doesn&#8217;t matter whether climate change is manmade or not</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 22:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paystolivegreen.com/?p=1123#comment-24682</guid>
		<description>[...] Let&#8217;s not walk into that trap. Let&#8217;s invest in energy sources that will last and phase out those that won&#8217;t. Let&#8217;s spend a little more now to save big later. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Let&#8217;s not walk into that trap. Let&#8217;s invest in energy sources that will last and phase out those that won&#8217;t. Let&#8217;s spend a little more now to save big later. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Repair stuff, save both kinds of green</title>
		<link>http://www.paystolivegreen.com/2009/07/how-to-save-money-by-spending-more-of-it/#comment-23812</link>
		<dc:creator>Repair stuff, save both kinds of green</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 16:57:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paystolivegreen.com/?p=1123#comment-23812</guid>
		<description>[...] than fixing broken stuff is having stuff that don&#8217;t break in the first place. Check out my guest post on quality versus cost over at Pays to Live Green for more on that.     AKPC_IDS += [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] than fixing broken stuff is having stuff that don&#8217;t break in the first place. Check out my guest post on quality versus cost over at Pays to Live Green for more on that.     AKPC_IDS += [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Two more R&#8217;s: Refuse and Repurpose</title>
		<link>http://www.paystolivegreen.com/2009/07/how-to-save-money-by-spending-more-of-it/#comment-23811</link>
		<dc:creator>Two more R&#8217;s: Refuse and Repurpose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 16:56:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paystolivegreen.com/?p=1123#comment-23811</guid>
		<description>[...] economically savvy and environmentally minded, you always buy quality once instead of junk twice [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] economically savvy and environmentally minded, you always buy quality once instead of junk twice [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Save Money Hound</title>
		<link>http://www.paystolivegreen.com/2009/07/how-to-save-money-by-spending-more-of-it/#comment-21069</link>
		<dc:creator>Save Money Hound</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 22:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paystolivegreen.com/?p=1123#comment-21069</guid>
		<description>Totally agree about buying quality stuff. You can use it longer so it won&#039;t need replacing so soon. It&#039;s too easy in our &quot;buy and throw away society&quot; to buy cheap junk and throw it away when it suits us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally agree about buying quality stuff. You can use it longer so it won&#8217;t need replacing so soon. It&#8217;s too easy in our &#8220;buy and throw away society&#8221; to buy cheap junk and throw it away when it suits us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Winther</title>
		<link>http://www.paystolivegreen.com/2009/07/how-to-save-money-by-spending-more-of-it/#comment-17390</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Winther</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 08:55:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paystolivegreen.com/?p=1123#comment-17390</guid>
		<description>@MoneyEnergy: Thanks for the tip about the Early Retirement Extreme blog. I&#039;ve done a bit of reading there; several good articles.

@MoneyEnergy and Pays to live green: Computers are products that are ripe for a beneficial change in consumer habits. Although improvements are being made, an average computer is still chock-full of hazardous waste and quite a bit of energy is spent producing them. People buy new computers way too often - a decent computer both quality- and performancewise will easily cover most people&#039;s needs for 6-7 years before breaking down. And when it does break down, most parts can be replaced without too much hassle.

@Seo83: Um...that really isn&#039;t what the post is about...although I can see how you would think so if you just read the headline.

@Pariswheel: Absolutely. Not only does low quality items create a waste problem by the sheer quantity of them being discarded, but they&#039;re usually made from parts that are hard to recycle, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@MoneyEnergy: Thanks for the tip about the Early Retirement Extreme blog. I&#8217;ve done a bit of reading there; several good articles.</p>
<p>@MoneyEnergy and Pays to live green: Computers are products that are ripe for a beneficial change in consumer habits. Although improvements are being made, an average computer is still chock-full of hazardous waste and quite a bit of energy is spent producing them. People buy new computers way too often &#8211; a decent computer both quality- and performancewise will easily cover most people&#8217;s needs for 6-7 years before breaking down. And when it does break down, most parts can be replaced without too much hassle.</p>
<p>@Seo83: Um&#8230;that really isn&#8217;t what the post is about&#8230;although I can see how you would think so if you just read the headline.</p>
<p>@Pariswheel: Absolutely. Not only does low quality items create a waste problem by the sheer quantity of them being discarded, but they&#8217;re usually made from parts that are hard to recycle, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pariswheel</title>
		<link>http://www.paystolivegreen.com/2009/07/how-to-save-money-by-spending-more-of-it/#comment-17352</link>
		<dc:creator>Pariswheel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 02:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paystolivegreen.com/?p=1123#comment-17352</guid>
		<description>Definitely agree with buying quality items rather than items that will break quickly but cost a low price. I can see how much of an effect this would have on the environment for waste alone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definitely agree with buying quality items rather than items that will break quickly but cost a low price. I can see how much of an effect this would have on the environment for waste alone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
