Study Finds Organic Foods Not More Nutritous
If you enjoyed this post, keep yourself updated with all my latest posts:
Sign Up for Daily Morning Emails
Comments
-
August 7th, 2009Trackback from : Follow the debate on the FSA organic report | PI Blog
-
August 7th, 2009Trackback from : Follow the debate on the FSA organic report | Pesticide Blog








I am still going to buy organic…weither its in my head or not, I just feel better when I purchase organic.
LOL no one has said yes yet…interesting
There is no guarantee that the food we consume is safe for us.. Atleast when it is organic..we can be assure its healthy… I won’t stop buying organic produce unless and until there is a major difference found in the nutritional content.
What a shocking revelation. But I am still tempted to go organic!!
I voted no because, for me… it’s not about the nutritional factor, As one example….I buy organic meat because I don’t want any hormones in the meat.
Till then,
Jean
It’s not that they are more nutritious…It is the fact that they do not have a artificial junk or have had anything done to them to change there original state.
Like Jean, I buy organic because it doesn’t have a load of chemicals in it and despite the nutrition being the same I believe it is better for your body.
In my opinion, the report is a red herring. It doesn’t say what protocols were used (it’s a summary of other research), but if they narrowly defined it and controlled for variables, it would look like this: take the same variety of vegetable and grow it with and without artificial pesticides and fertilizers.
The result is entirely predictable: no significant difference in nutritional content by weight. It’s also irrelevant. The legitimate, and sufficient, reasons for preferring organic produce concern environmental responsibility and toxic residues, not nutrition. Of course, some organic producers have claimed more benefit than they had; that’s business SOP and I’m sure there’s much more of it coming from food factories.
I don’t understand why an organic apple is almost twice the price of a regular apple. I would figure that without the use of expensive pesticides and/or hormones added to these natural foods, the price savings would be forwarded to the customer.
Well I think I agree with this article, you probably DO get the same amount of vitamins weather organic or not. The real difference with organic is you don’t get all the chemicals along with with nutrition, so I will continue to by organic produce.
Of course, my consumption of organic foods is because of what is NOT in them. But the important point is that this reductionist attitude is deeply misleading. Michael Pollan called it ‘nutritionism’. Plus, I have some doubts about the study itself: there are SO MANY variables in nutrient content, depending on things like variety, time of harvest, condition of the field, weather, post-harvest handling … and on and on. You can probably conduct a study to get whatever results you want. Better to go back to what Grandma said: if the colour and flavour are good, it’s likely good for you.